Since I have been picking on the VP-babe Sarah Palin, lets see how she did when she was questioned on laws of the land – specifically the Supreme Court decision – which is incidently the favorite fodder of the conservatives of the land.
I would have expected a very passionate answer from her on that.. blasting the Supreme Court for all the anti-Christian decisions that the court took. But her answer to Katie Couric followed the same trajectory that the other, now famous, answers followed…
Asked which decisions, other that Roe, she disagreed with, her responses went as follows:
PALIN: Well, let’s see. There’s –of course –in the great history of America rulings there have been rulings, there’s never going to be absolute consensus by every American. And there are — those issues, again, like Roe v Wade where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So you know — going through the history of America, there would be others but–”
COURIC: Can you think of any?
PALIN: Well, I could think of — of any again, that could be best dealt with on a more local level. Maybe I would take issue with. But you know, as mayor, and then as governor and even as a Vice President, if I’m so privileged to serve, wouldn’t be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today.
Can you tell me what she said in her second reply? I just could not make out ANYTHING!! Remember that “Cow” essay? This super-intelligent VP-babe reminds me of the author of that essay!! 😉